A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a
A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a
Blog Article
five. Discovered Deputy Prosecutor General along with counsel with the complainant further argued that during the investigation in the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led into the recovery of sleeping drugs on 14.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore has become made before the Court wherein the sleeping tablets were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected while in the liver although not in the stomach. That's why, the recovery of said sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Learned Deputy Prosecutor General along with counsel for that complainant have also argued that during the investigation with the case the petitioner Bhoora led to your recovery of the motorcycle.
Some sites may possibly specialize in specific areas of law, though others offer a broader database. Factors to take into account when selecting a website include things like the comprehensiveness in the database, the benefit of navigation, and the availability of advanced search options.
These platforms empower individuals to understand their legal rights and obligations, promoting a more informed and just society.
maintaining the conviction awarded into the appellant reduce the sentence with the appellant from imprisonment for life to one already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)
The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is an extensive bit of legislation that defines many criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for those found guilty.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is additionally a properly-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings over the evidence.
Allow’s center on what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی click here شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based to the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances of your case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more
2. I have listened to the figured out counsel for that parties in addition to discovered DPG at length, perused the record and observed that:-
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight provided to any reported judgment might rely upon the reputation of both the reporter and also the judges.[7]
In order to prove murder, there needs to be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – and that injury subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.
13309-B of 2010 to generally be weak types of evidence and the evidentiary value whereof would be seen on the time on the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Hence, confirmed custody on the petitioner in jail is not likely to serve any useful purpose at this stage.”
Pakistan’s legal system is not without flaws: overhauling is overdue as well as the legislation regarding murder calls for critical reconsideration and clarification. To the time being, the minimum that can be achieved is to be sure that the First Investigation Report (FIR) is registered with honesty and after properly ascertaining the facts.